History
does not have to wait its customary
half-century. Even now, the World Trade Center
site merits inclusion on the National Register
of Historic Places, according to a determination
made on Friday by three government agencies. The
agencies, the Lower Manhattan Development
Corporation, the Federal Transit Administration
and the Federal Highway Administration, did not
actually nominate ground zero or place it on the
register. But their finding would have much the
same practical effect by requiring that, if
possible, ways be found to avoid or reduce any
damaging impacts that redevelopment might have
on the site's historic nature. And that is
considerable. "The surviving physical
features at the site, including the large
bathtub, slurry walls and the surviving bases of
steel columns, convey the tragedy and
destruction that took place on Sept. 11,"
the 19-page document concluded.
The National Park Service keeps the register,
which now lists nearly 82,000 places. It does
not ordinarily consider a property whose
significance goes back less than a half-century,
unless what happened there was of exceptional
importance. (An example in Manhattan is the
Stonewall Inn on Christopher Street, often
called the birthplace of the gay civil rights
movement because of an uprising by bar patrons
during a police raid in 1969. It was added to
the register 30 years later.)
In the case of the trade center, the agencies
said there was already more than enough evidence
of the exceptional importance of the terrorist
attacks in United States history, including the
"deaths of an unprecedented number of
individuals in a single location resulting from
foreign attacks on American soil." Kevin M.
Rampe, the president of the Lower Manhattan
Development Corporation, said the determination
reflected his agency's overall approach to the
site. "From the beginning, we've been
committed to ensuring that the historic nature
of the site is not only recognized, but
preserved," Mr. Rampe said, "while at
the same time restoring the site to its historic
role as a center of commerce, as it was on Sept.
11."
While almost no one would dispute the
historic nature of the attack, there has been
considerable uncertainty and debate over the
significance of the physical remains. Three
months ago, in the face of a growing
preservation campaign, the corporation required
the finalists in the memorial competition to
ensure that their designs would provide future
visitors with access to the lowermost
foundations of the twin towers. Earlier rules
said only that the tower outlines, or
footprints, should be made visible in the
memorial design.
Remnants of the enormous steel columns that
define the footprints were among the existing
features highlighted in the new document. It
also noted the presence of:
¶The towers' interior columns and elevator
pits, pumps and drainage lines.
¶A heavily damaged stairway and escalator
structure that once led up from Vesey Street to
the trade center plaza and a pedestrian bridge
leading to 7 World Trade Center.
¶Vestiges of the
95-year-old terminal of the Hudson &
Manhattan Railroad, predecessor of the PATH
system, including two cast-iron tubes through
which trains ran.
¶Parts of six floors of the underground
parking garage, where smoke scars from the
attack are still visible, and openings in the
foundation wall that once led to the garage from
ramps in the middle of West Street.
¶Holes for two pairs of pipes, with
diameters of 60 inches and 66 inches, that were
used to pump water between the Hudson River and
the trade center's cooling system.
"Physical features surviving on the site
that have structural, functional and material
integrity retain their quality of association
with the profound events of that day, as well as
the post-Sept. 11 recovery effort," the
document said. "Although buildings and
infrastructure within the W.T.C. were destroyed
and their ruins removed, the physical
environment surrounding the W.T.C. site remains
essentially as it was on Sept. 11."
The review is required by the National
Historic Preservation Act for projects that
receive federal financing. These include the
permanent PATH terminal, the rebuilding of West
Street-Route 9A and the overall planning by the
development corporation, which is supported by a
grant from the Department of Housing and Urban
Development. More than 60 "consulting
parties" - including relatives of those who
died in the attack, city and state officials,
three United States representatives, planners
and architects, property owners and tribal
representatives - are also participating.
They will have 30 days to comment, said Irene
Chang, the vice president for legal affairs and
counsel at the development corporation, after
which the agencies will determine what adverse
effects their projects might have on historical
resources. One consulting party, the Coalition
of 9/11 Families, raised objections to a Jan. 21
draft, which did not distinguish the boxlike
perimeter columns from other structural remains.
Apparently in response, the final version
described the "box beam column footings
that outline the space where the twin towers
stood." Ms. Chang also said the final
document included a greater discussion of
precolonial history of the site, at the request
of the Shinnecock and Delaware Indian nations.